A 2020 guest series by Anne Maloney, inspired by James Taranto. This one’s a bit late, but that’s my fault, not Dr. Maloney’s. Ahem. A Bye-Ku for Kirsten Gillibrand Back to the Senate White House not the reward for Shaming Al Franken.
A 2020 guest series by Anne Maloney, inspired by James Taranto. A Bye-Ku for Seth Moulton Strove for the center But Dems want only left turns Back to Salem, Seth.
A 2020 guest series by Anne Maloney, inspired by James Taranto. A Bye-Ku for Jay Inslee Back to Seattle chilly climate never warmed to Pres. Jay Inslee.
Trump’s current approval rating is pretty similar to the approval rating for both Obama and Reagan at this point in their respective presidencies. (Trump 43%, Obama 45%, Reagan 43%.) Reagan’s recovered sharply over the course of the election year, and … Continue reading
A 2020 guest series by Anne Maloney, inspired by James Taranto. A Bye-Ku for John Hickenlooper A Hickenlooper Cannot be the President His name’s too funny.
A 2020 guest series by Anne Maloney, inspired by James Taranto. A Bye-Ku for Eric Swalwell Back to Golden State With your viral Eric hair Not bold, big or good.
“Error has no rights.” It’s not clear where this axiom comes from. (Some say the Inquisition. I can’t find it before Orestes Brownson, who critiqued it.) Yet the axiom seems correct to me, and I think, at some level, most … Continue reading
We have recently seen the passage of a number of “heartbeat bills.” These laws provide legal protections to unborn children who have achieved a detectable heartbeat. Embyronic heartbeat begins around the fourth week after the last menstrual period (or roughly two weeks … Continue reading
This is the 2020 sequel to Unflattering Assessments of 2016 Presidential Candidates. I realized today that I need to get these in before candidates start dropping out like flies. I admit I am not as mean this year, but only because I … Continue reading
I was surprised to see Justice Alito joining the Supreme Court majority in Iancu v. Brunetti today. This is a trademark case. The U.S. Trademark Office rejected a trademark for the brand “FUCT” because of a law (the Lanham Act) … Continue reading
You must be logged in to post a comment.